Hostile Witness!
Approaching Literature With Christian Discernment

Suppose I asked you to read a book whose pages were sprinkled with murder, rape, incest, adultery, mutilation, blasphemy, idolatry ­ a virtually inexhaustible catalog of human sin? Perhaps you would take offense. But if you have grown up in church, this same book has been recommended to you by the most upright and moral people you know. It’s the Bible. God’s Word pulls no punches when it comes to the depravity of man’s fallen nature; even the heroes of the faith are depicted in a stark light, from the sexual sin of King David in the Old Testament to Peter’s prevaricating weakness in the New Testament. The Bible is the most frank and open book ever written, which makes sense when you consider the Author’s intention.

  There is a difference between the sin depicted in the Bible and what we find in our own literature: God does not glorify, condone or rationalize evil, but men do. Even authors with a healthy fear of God and respect for His Word remain fallible, and so they build fault lines into their fictions. As a Christian, you must develop the habit of reading everything with discernment, no matter the source. Sometimes unbelievers touch on God’s truth in their writings, and sometimes believers, despite their best efforts, miss it entirely. So we must learn to enjoy discernment or give up on enjoyment altogether!

One of the questions I have asked myself in starting a Christian reading group is what kind of books to read. My training in literature demands that they be well-written. My commitment as a Christian demands that they offer opportunities for growth. In a sense, every book I have considered has proven objectionable on some grounds, so I have developed a methodology for approaching them that I wish to share. I call it “Hostile Witness.”

 

Putting Sin on the Stand

Every Christian educator is faced with the dilemma: how do you teach your students about things like literature and the arts without exposing them unduly to corrupting influences? The answer is to equip them with a mechanism for discernment. Christians turned loose in the world without this mechanism either revert to insularity and close-mindedness, which makes outreach difficult, or succumb to worldly influences, which makes holiness impossible. So the question is, how do we promote discernment?

In the courtroom, prosecutors are often put in a similar situation. They want to call a witness to the stand to provide valuable information, but they are suspicious of the motives this witness brings to the case. How can they extract the testimony without introducing a misleading bias in the jury? They designate the individual as a hostile witness. With a hostile witness, the prosecutor has more freedom in his tactics ­ and more importantly, the jury entertains no doubts about the relationship between the witness and the facts. What the witness says may be true, but it must be tested.

  The books we tackle in the Reading Group should be approached in the same way. They contain important information ­ sometimes they will deepen our faith, sometimes they will help us understand the world better ­ but they are not entirely reliable. Where they glorify, condone or rationalize sin, we must call them to order. But where they present truth, we should remain open to it.

 

What About Sex, Violence and Bad Language?

Perhaps the most difficult aspect of literary discernment is figuring out what to do with books that are well-written and worth discussing, but include references which ought to offend a Christian (whether they do or not is sometimes in doubt, but they should). There are two approaches I have seen others take:

 

The appeal to maturity
Some would-be sophisticates say, “Hey, we’re all grown ups here.” As Christians, we enjoy a certain liberty, and if we exercise discernment we should be safe from corrupting influences. To an extent, I agree, but we should never get too comfortable with this position. The moment we lose our uneasiness around sin, we undermine the whole purpose of discernment.

 

The washing of hands
Some take the opposite approach, trying to make the world we live in cleaner than it really is. They are more scrupulous than the Biblical authors on some points! On the other hand, is there such a thing as being too safe? We shouldn’t dismiss this position out of hand.

 

I find myself looking for a middle ground. One compromise I have attempted is to look for books published prior to the general relaxation of morals in society. This way, we can look at books that accurately represent life under the sun, without having sin flaunted in our faces. This approach probably doesn’t satisfy either argument entirely, but it addresses in part each concern. We don’t confine ourselves to a ghetto of inferior literature, but at the same time we take seriously the need to avoid getting cozy with unrighteousness. (Interestingly enough, my spell-checker doesn’t recognize “unrighteousness” as a word ­ sign of the times?)

 

Authors and Authority

Stories are driven by characters and conflict ­ in other words, people faced with moral choices. Our everyday lives are the same, only the choices are not so dramatic. One of the benefits of studying literature is having the opportunity to examine the relationship between the author and his text. Writers create a certain environment in which their characters live, and the choices the characters must make are dictated by the author. That means the author’s beliefs and convictions will color the way he presents the choices.

   Have you ever found yourself reading a book or watching a movie and feeling good about a character’s sin? Suppose an independent young woman finally builds up the courage to leave her boring husband and run away to the islands with that cute guy from the office. You know it’s wrong, but within the story it feels right. Why? Because the situation has been constructed by an author, and that author’s moral framework shapes how you feel about the work. In a sense, you are being manipulated, although the author may not have intended this. Moral choices are sometimes presented in such a way that the traditional white hats and black hats are exchanged ­ the good guys become bad and the bad guys become good. This is particularly true when you look at the representation of Christians in the media.

    Telling you all this is one thing. In the Reading Group, I want to show you. Some people would argue that this is a good reason never to read a “worldly” book, but I would suggest that even the titles available at your Christian bookstore must be read with discernment, and that reading the so-called “great” books with discernment is better for you than reading the so-called “safe” books without it.

The goal is to develop an understanding of how stories are shaped by their authors and how this fashioning introduces influences you have to guard against. You have to recognize the author and audit his authority.

Man’s creation, including his literary work, is necessarily flawed. But God reveals truth even through flawed work.

 

 

 

 

This essay was written as a handout for the first in a long line of book discussions I led under the auspices of Sword In Hand. My goal was lay a groundwork for interpreting (and sometimes interrogating) great books from a Christian perspective. There is much more to be said about the subject that this, of course, and I hope to post further elaborations as time permits. - JMB

 

All content © 2004-2007 by jmarkbertrand.com
Reproduction without permission is prohibited.